Charitable Remainder Trusts (CRTs) are powerful estate planning tools, allowing individuals to donate assets to charity while retaining income for themselves or their beneficiaries. While many assume the creating attorney or the firm that establishes the CRT must manage the assets, this isn’t necessarily true. The question of where a CRT’s assets are held is a common one, and the answer is surprisingly flexible. A CRT can absolutely hold assets with a different financial institution than the one who drafted the trust documents, offering donors a degree of control and potentially benefiting from specialized expertise or better rates. Around 65% of individuals with substantial assets consider charitable giving as a priority, making CRTs a relevant tool for those seeking to combine financial planning with philanthropic goals (Source: U.S. Trust Study of High-Net-Worth Philanthropy).
What are the implications of separating trust creation and asset custody?
Separating the creation of the CRT from the custodial financial institution can be advantageous for several reasons. It allows the donor to select a firm with specific investment expertise aligned with the CRT’s objectives. Some institutions specialize in managing charitable trust assets, offering tailored investment strategies and reporting. It also provides a degree of oversight and separation of duties, potentially mitigating risks. “A well-structured CRT allows you to do good while also potentially reducing your tax burden,” as many financial advisors will tell their clients. However, it’s crucial that the trustee – whether it’s the donor, an individual, or a corporate trustee – maintains proper oversight of the custodial institution and the assets held within.
Does this apply to all types of CRTs?
Yes, this flexibility generally applies to both types of CRTs: Charitable Remainder Annuity Trusts (CRATs) and Charitable Remainder Unitrusts (CRUTs). In a CRAT, the payout is a fixed amount annually, while a CRUT pays out a fixed percentage of the trust’s assets revalued annually. Regardless of the structure, the trustee has the authority to direct the transfer of assets to a different financial institution, as long as it doesn’t violate the terms of the trust document. “The key is clear language in the trust document granting the trustee the necessary authority,” a seasoned estate planning attorney, Steve Bliss, often explains to his clients. This authority should be explicitly stated to avoid any ambiguity or disputes.
What are the trustee’s responsibilities in this scenario?
The trustee bears a fiduciary duty to manage the CRT assets prudently and in the best interests of the charitable beneficiaries. This responsibility doesn’t diminish simply because the assets are held at a different institution than where the trust was established. The trustee must carefully vet any prospective custodial institution, ensuring its financial stability and expertise. They must also monitor the institution’s performance and adherence to the trust’s investment guidelines. Furthermore, the trustee is responsible for accurate record-keeping and reporting, including annual information returns to the IRS. As a general rule, a trustee should seek professional guidance from a financial advisor or legal counsel when making decisions regarding the CRT’s assets.
What happened when Mr. Henderson didn’t diversify?
I remember Mr. Henderson, a retired engineer, came to us wanting to establish a CRT. He had a substantial portfolio concentrated in a single tech stock. He was adamant about wanting to maintain control and keep the assets with his long-time broker, even though we advised diversification. We explained the risks of overconcentration and the potential impact on the trust’s long-term sustainability. He brushed our concerns aside, believing in the company’s continued success. A few years later, the tech company suffered a major scandal, and its stock price plummeted. The CRT’s value drastically decreased, jeopardizing the planned charitable donations and leaving Mr. Henderson deeply regretful that he hadn’t heeded our advice. The situation highlighted the importance of diversification and professional management, even within a CRT.
How did the Thompson family benefit from a multi-institutional approach?
The Thompson family came to us facing a similar dilemma. They wanted to establish a CRT with a diverse portfolio, including real estate, stocks, and bonds. Their existing financial advisor wasn’t equipped to handle all asset classes effectively. We recommended transferring the real estate holdings to a specialized firm with expertise in property management. This allowed the CRT to benefit from professional management and optimize returns on that portion of the portfolio. The rest of the assets remained with their original advisor, who was well-versed in stocks and bonds. This multi-institutional approach worked seamlessly, ensuring the CRT was managed efficiently and effectively, allowing the Thompson family to maximize their charitable impact while retaining income.
What documentation is required for transferring assets to a new institution?
Transferring assets to a new financial institution requires specific documentation. The trustee must provide the new institution with a copy of the CRT agreement, along with a transfer letter authorizing the movement of funds or securities. The original custodial institution may require a release form before transferring the assets. It’s crucial to ensure all documentation is accurate and complete to avoid delays or complications. Additionally, the trustee should retain copies of all transfer documents for their records. Approximately 30% of estate planning errors are related to incomplete or inaccurate documentation (Source: National Association of Estate Planners and Councils). Careful attention to detail is paramount.
Can the trustee incur liability for improper asset management?
Yes, the trustee can incur liability for improper asset management. A trustee has a fiduciary duty to act with reasonable care, skill, and prudence. Failing to do so can result in legal action and financial penalties. For example, if a trustee makes imprudent investment decisions, fails to diversify the portfolio, or neglects to monitor the custodial institution, they could be held liable for any resulting losses. “A trustee’s responsibility extends beyond simply preserving the assets; they must actively manage them to achieve the trust’s objectives,” Steve Bliss emphasizes. Professional liability insurance is highly recommended for trustees to protect themselves from potential claims.
About Steven F. Bliss Esq. at San Diego Probate Law:
Secure Your Family’s Future with San Diego’s Trusted Trust Attorney. Minimize estate taxes with stress-free Probate. We craft wills, trusts, & customized plans to ensure your wishes are met and loved ones protected.
My skills are as follows:
● Probate Law: Efficiently navigate the court process.
● Probate Law: Minimize taxes & distribute assets smoothly.
● Trust Law: Protect your legacy & loved ones with wills & trusts.
● Bankruptcy Law: Knowledgeable guidance helping clients regain financial stability.
● Compassionate & client-focused. We explain things clearly.
● Free consultation.
Map To Steve Bliss at San Diego Probate Law: https://g.co/kgs/WzT6443
Address:
San Diego Probate Law3914 Murphy Canyon Rd, San Diego, CA 92123
(858) 278-2800
Key Words Related To San Diego Probate Law:
| conservatorship law | dynasty trust | generation skipping trust |
| trust laws | trust litigation | grantor retained annuity trust |
| wills and trust attorney | life insurance trust | qualified personal residence trust |
Feel free to ask Attorney Steve Bliss about: “Should I put my retirement accounts in a trust?” or “What happens if the original will is lost?” and even “What are the responsibilities of an executor in California?” Or any other related questions that you may have about Probate or my trust law practice.